this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
310 points (97.3% liked)

BrainWorms

1830 readers
1 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 years ago (15 children)

Good. I’m not sure how the founding fathers didn’t conceive of this becoming a problem in the first place

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Weren't a few of them outright begging for people to not cling to political parties? They probably were hoping that the courts would remain bipartisan just because they would be on the stands longer than whatever recent trend was going on when they were nominated in.

Whereas if they had terms like the other branches they would always be voted in based on current issues.

Of course, at the time they did all this, Judicial Review hadn't even been conceived yet, let alone using judicial review to undo other supreme court cases en-masse.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Weren't a few of them outright begging for people to not cling to political parties?

For the most part they were stupid to do so. Coalition building is independent of even government system. Look at the political parties behind the Nikea riots during the reign of Emperor Justinian. The truth is you could have sortition form the legislative branch and they would STILL develop political parties.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)