this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
125 points (99.2% liked)
chapotraphouse
13473 readers
1 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Invasive BUT they're actually not that bad for the ecology. The California Invasive Plant Council has found that tumbleweeds have no discernable impact to possibly a small positive impact on the ecologies they invade. They don't seem to be able to displace native species, instead finding the most success in disturbed soils, which they've been found to help stabilize and facilitate the introduction of other plants into (both by providing shelter and by introducing phosphorus to the soil). Even native small animals have come to use them for shelter and hunting grounds. Apparently the worst parts of tumbleweeds is that they're a nuisance to humans and they host an agricultural pest.
In the case of Tumbleweeds v Suburbs, I find for the tumbleweeds.
You've convinced me.
I propose that we shift our hatred to invasive buckthorn
They're a fire hazard.
At least relative to California ecologies, Cal IPC found that the tumbleweed didn't significantly change fire risk. In fact, Tumbleweeds don't usually get dead and dry until the first rains come. Right now, they're some of the last plants that are still green in the central valley.
#teamtumbleweed