this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
317 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

39901 readers
299 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] luciole@beehaw.org 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I hate headlines. They’re written on purpose to piss me off and sometimes they work. Maybe I should stop reading headlines and just read the articles instead. Probably healthier than the other way around.

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

How would you identify and decide which articles to read?

[–] luciole@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago

I’d pick a reasonable source, then I’d go with a mix of pure chance and good old fashioned skimming.

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

By stopping reading headlines and just read the articles instead.

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just read the articles instead

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 4 points 2 years ago
[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] mudkip05@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

Presumably all of them from specific sources. I'm hoping this person's plan isn't to indiscriminately read every article on the entire internet, although that would be quite a feat lol.

[–] Tertle950@lemmy.basedcount.com 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

the articles

The Articles

THE ARTICLES

T H E A R T I C L E S

T H E A R T I C L E S ! ! !

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago
[–] radix@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

(I can see your take. I'm not making fun of you, but) I can imagine this being a reason why Twitter got rid of titles for articles in tweets.