this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
202 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

74754 readers
1668 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The first commercial PV solar product was nah just in 1909.

See story above, and original article in Modern Electrics magazine in 1909:

https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015051407073

EDIT

Since people didn't read past the headline, the article is about a startup company in 1905 that developed a commercial electrical solar panel by 1909 and was worth 160 million in today's money.

In 1909, the inventor of the solar panel was kidnapped and ordered by his kidnappers to destroy all information about this solar panel. He was eventually released, although he did not destroy the solar panel or his documentation, he did shut down his company.

So this is a pretty fascinating development considering that at this time period we actually did have early production electric cars that were manufactured in larger quantities than gas vehicles, and now we learn that solar panels were commercially available, at least for a short time.


And the solar panels could generate a fair amount of electricity:

500 volts per 10 square ft, and a smaller demonstration panel that was 3 ft x 4 ft could generate 60 watts of power (10 volts @6 amps).

Additionally, the panels were designed to charge a battery backup system.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (29 children)

Likey also didn't contain rare earth minerals - no where near as effective but could have been less damaging and easier to make.

Then again, could have been a combination of arsenic, asbestos and cocaine so who knows.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 11 points 2 years ago (28 children)

I was too curious:

Cove's device was a sort of thermocouple, and thus not based on newly-discovered natural processes or scientific principles. In the patent application the device was described as follows: A thermo-electric battery and appurtenances comprising a block of incombustible, non-conductive material, a series of pairs of elements comprising a plurality of elements formed of an alloy of antinomy and zinc, and a plurality of elements connecting said antinomy and zinc elements, said elements connecting said first-mentioned elements being alternatively of copper and of an alloy of nickel, copper and zinc.

https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/MCR/article/view/17744/22231

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (22 children)

No such thing as too curious... unless you are a cat. Little dangerous there.

If im reading this correctly, and translated to english:

  • non conductive block

  • two different alloys - zinc and opposite to zinc (antinomy) v copper and nickle/copper/zinc.

  • assuming light hits, produces difference between metal and opposite metal, results in current flow through wire to equalize. Not sure how rare earth Nickle and zinc are, but suppose its not cobalt.

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 years ago

Nickel and zinc are very common to my knowledge. And much easier to mine than lithium

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)