this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
233 points (96.4% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't think arrows were able to penetrate plate armor. At least from bows idk bout crossbows

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They were. Look up bodkin arrows. Also, a lot of the knights got mired, and then killed by the archers with daggers who didn't sink as much.

[–] dessimbelackis@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Better yet look up Tods Workshop on YouTube arrows vs armour and then think of thousands upon thousands of archers piling shaft after shaft into the French knights

[–] ericbomb@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Long bows were much more powerful than most cross bows.

Crossbows were easier to use though. First crossbows were seen in 500 bc and never really vanished.

Long bows in a trained archers hand was just better.