If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse, and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality. - Desmond Tutu
It really is that simple folks. Any both-sidesism, well-actualling, or fence-sitting as it relates to Israel and Palestine is simple moral cowardice. Anything less than full-throated support for Palestinian liberation and denunciation of Israel apartheid and murder is de facto support for Israel.
Liberals love to talk about nuance and how actually issues are very complex because they don't have principles; they have positions that can be changed at any moment according to their convenience. They pretend that not taking a stand is a sign of their intelligence, maturity and objectivity. In actuality they are as cowardly and vicious as the most rabid neocon. Their hands are drenched in blood.
Sorry, just had to vent. The last week has been a real blackpill for me, even as someone who lived through the hysteria of 9/11. Death to America. Death to Israel. Death to the West.
Sith are interesting because their code is actually not awful? If you avoid all connotations of what Sith actually are in media.
There's room in that for a philosophy about self-actualization, liberation, and revolutionary action. But no, it's only antisocial edgelords. You can be that, or a magic cop.
I wasn't directly knocking the Sith, though in application throughout the lore the Sith apply the above code in Ayn Rand style ways and put others in chains and deny them their passions, deprive them of power, and enslave them.
The Sith code is too individualistic. I looked up the Jedi Code, and it doesn't have the "I." The Jedi Code can be interpreted as what is vs what ought to be or the individual vs society vs the universe.