this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
260 points (87.1% liked)

Technology

75063 readers
3291 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Disney’s Loki faces backlash over reported use of generative AI / A Loki season 2 poster has been linked to a stock image on Shutterstock that seemingly breaks the platform’s licensing rules regard...::A promotional poster for the second season of Loki on Disney Plus has sparked controversy amongst professional designers following claims that it was created using generative AI.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 153 points 2 years ago (43 children)

I don't understand the controversy really. A graphic designer at Disney used stock photography in their design of the poster, that's pretty normal and extremely common. It turns out that whoever uploaded that stock image to the service used AI to create it, but how is that Disney's fault? I don't get it.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 57 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (27 children)

AI taking the job of someone else by stealing art aside,

According to Shutterstock’s contributor rules, AI-generated content is not permitted to be licensed on the platform unless it’s created using Shutterstock’s own AI-image generator tool.

The picture was not flagged as AI, so it was sold as real art against their TOS.

I don't think the artists or even the studio did this maliciously, but there needs to be discussion on how stock art should be vetted when used like this

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (40 replies)