this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
862 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

74055 readers
3059 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A lawsuit filed by more victims of the sex trafficking operation claims that Pornhub’s moderation staff ignored reports of their abuse videos.


Sixty-one additional women are suing Pornhub’s parent company, claiming that the company failed to take down videos of their abuse as part of the sex trafficking operation Girls Do Porn. They’re suing the company and its sites for sex trafficking, racketeering, conspiracy to commit racketeering, and human trafficking.

The complaint, filed on Tuesday, includes what it claims are internal emails obtained by the plaintiffs, represented by Holm Law Group, between Pornhub moderation staff. The emails allegedly show that Pornhub had only one moderator to review 700,000 potentially abusive videos, and that the company intentionally ignored repeated reports from victims in those videos.

The damages and restitution they seek amounts to more than $311,100,000. They demand a jury trial, and seek damages of $5 million per plaintiff, as well as restitution for all the money Aylo, the new name for Pornhub’s parent company, earned “marketing, selling and exploiting Plaintiffs’ videos in an amount that exceeds one hundred thousand dollars for each plaintiff.”

The plaintiffs are 61 more unnamed “Jane Doe” victims of Girls Do Porn, adding to the 60 that sued Pornhub in 2020 for similar claims.
Girls Do Porn was a federally-convicted sex trafficking ring that coerced young women into filming pornographic videos under the pretense of “modeling” gigs. In some cases, the women were violently abused. The operators told them that the videos would never appear online, so that their home communities wouldn’t find out, but they uploaded the footage to sites like Pornhub, where the videos went viral—and in many instances, destroyed their lives. Girls Do Porn was an official Pornhub content partner, with its videos frequently appearing on the front page, where they gathered millions of views.

read more: https://www.404media.co/girls-do-porn-victims-sue-pornhub-for-300-million/

archive: https://archive.ph/zQWt3#selection-593.0-609.599

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 62 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (16 children)

Given their videos were so highly ranked, the prevalence of coercion in the industry, and the fact that it's often impossible to tell if someone's been threatened behind the scenes, it's highly likely that most people reading this who have watched porn online have also watched plenty of videos of actual rapes.

This is a simple fact, but one which a lot of people would rather deny, rather than admit their part in perpetuating it, while wondering why watching porn makes them sad. Partly, I suspect, because deep down they know the truth of it.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I wonder how many products you've bought in your life were made by child labor.

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There is no ethical consumption under capitalism

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Which is why I dislike people who attack those critical of capitalism's excesses for being hypocrites.

In the real world, most of us are hypocrites and part of the problem. That doesn't mean we can't try to be better or be critical of things that are bad about society.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Complaining about a system you’re stuck in doesn’t make you a hypocrite for being stuck in it

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

But there is something circular and self-serving about saying “it’s not me, it’s the system, and I can do nothing about that system.”

Notice how this offloads all the responsibility and blame elsewhere, forever, while requiring no change whatsoever of us?

That doesn’t sit well with me. There’s some truth in it but there’s also a lot of convenience in it.

[–] uranibaba@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Everyone can try to change the system, and you will need a lot of people to follow you to make that happen, which is not easy. So saying that "I can do nothing about the system" may not always be so untrue.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I would say, if you can’t do it alone, then start swaying others. But the reality is that anyone who wants to get involved will find the world is full of organizations already off the ground and doing important work. Find your fit and make your contribution.

“But I can only do a little - I’ll never be able to solve ALL the problems”

Better to light a candle than curse the darkness.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I'll eat meat that comes from large scale animal torture, my taxes have paid for bombs to kill civilians, I've spent money on countless products that exploit an untold amount of people. My country is one that benefits from resource extraction of the third world.

I get to live in relative opulence while billions have a fraction of the quality of life I do.

At the end of the day, I just accept these things and continue to live my life.

I've always seen myself as a good person. But I figured I can't be a good person and do all that. That mismatch in identity caused me to re-evaluate my position. Turns out I'm not actually willing to give up anything from above. So I'm probably a bad person.

That way there's no hypocrisy.

The Bible actually brings this up in an interesting way. Rich man goes up to Jesus and asks how to get into Heaven. Jesus says sell all your belongings and give the proceeds to charity. Then follow me. Rich man cried.

We're all going to hell.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We're arguably all evil, yeah. If you let a kid drown, you're evil. If you let a kid drown 5000 miles away, because you'd rather buy a pc game or something you don't really need, than donate to charity, that's also evil. If you donate 50 bucks at christmas, to prevent one kid from drowning, that doesn't mean you're not evil if you let another 100 drown during the rest of the year.

People have a really hard time accepting that they're not good. Vanity is the Devil's favourite sin.

But that doesn't mean we shouldn't at least try to be better. It's not because you and I eat meat, that we should also go kick a puppy to death. That puppy does matter. Stop kicking puppies to death!

[–] kava@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Of course, I agree with you. I would never initiate an action with the intention of causing harm - like kicking a puppy to death.

I also try to help when not too inconvenient for me. I typically give spare cash to homeless whenever they show up in front of me. I try and tip service workers well. I donate to a few non-profits, although they are mainly open source projects and is admittedly more ideologically driven than ethically. I try to be kind and polite and compassionate to the people in my life.

I'm just not about to dedicate my life to feeding the homeless or caring for orphans. I don't care enough besides giving a few bucks here and there. I'm simply just more concerned about myself and my family.

Having said that, of course we can do better and we should try. For example the animal thing. If lab grown meat was at a comparable quality and price, I would prefer it every time. If I can choose the option of less harm without lowering my quality of life I would in a heartbeat. But I actually won't lower my quality of life, at least not significantly.

It's a similar story with environmentalism. The only real way to lower carbon emissions to a level where the climate isn't at long term risk is for billions of people to stop using so much energy, stop eating so much meat & carbon heavy foods (almonds, avocados, etc), stop driving cars, stop using A/C, stop buying items that get sent on cargo ships all across the world, etc.

We can reduce it with renewable energies and plastic substitutes and reducing personal usage, carbon taxes.. whatever. But nobody is actually willing to go back to the 18th century. Any modern society at such a scale that we have will inevitably change the climate. The Unabomber had it right 50 years ago and nobody wants to admit it.

For example even renewables. To build solar panels requires a supply chain with a massive amount of carbon being released into the air. You can't escape it. Just like I think you can't escape evils against humans in our society. The machine is cold and uncaring. The gears will not slow down just because a child (or a million) gets caught inside of them. It will keep spinning unrelentingly as if nothing happened, crushing without feeling.

Maybe I'm just cynical, I don't know.

I like that quote you give, vanity is the devil's favorite sin. Question, are you a believer? Do you believe in a God? The Christian God?

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The first honest comment I’ve seen here.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The main problem with criticisms of capitalism Is that they don’t include “trying to be better.” As in: practical solutions. I think many of us use “capitalism” as a dark hole we can shove all the blame into. But no one ever has any realistic suggestions for change. There are plenty of fantasy ideas. Anarcho-syndicalism will save us if we overthrow the world order tomorrow!

I understand it’s a deeply embedded system and not simple to do away with. But just using it as a scapegoat constantly without any actual plan or will to depart from it is in fact an empty approach.

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Indeed. You can know that your own life is dependant on the exploitation of others whilst working to make that less so.

I have to. The alternative is death.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

We have likely bought many, often after lying to ourselves about it.

Do two wrongs make a right?

Also:

Tu quoque (/tjuːˈkwoʊkwi, tuːˈkwoʊkweɪ/;[1] Latin Tū quoque, for "you also") is a discussion technique that intends to discredit the opponent's argument by attacking the opponent's own personal behavior and actions as being inconsistent with their argument, therefore accusing hypocrisy. This specious reasoning is a special type of ad hominem attack. The Oxford English Dictionary cites John Cooke's 1614 stage play The Cittie Gallant as the earliest use of the term in the English language.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I guess it would depend on if the person wears clothing or not

[–] PainInTheAES@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I practice ethical nudism 😎

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Not to mention the animal suffering we’re all responsible for with all our soaps and cosmetic products being sprayed into their eyes and rubbed into their skin to make sure it’s safe for us. And while I believe animals can be raised for meat humanely and ethically, they’re very often not.

[–] Arotrios@kbin.social 62 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I avoid this by not watching porn that makes me sad. There's plenty of consensual, happy, joyful sex-positive porn out there.

While your point is valid about this particular situation (which is horrible and criminal on multiple levels), your overbroad generalization of porn and the implied assumption of guilt in the viewers is what's led folks to react negatively to your statement.

On a larger level, this kind of statement plays into the puritanical doctrines towards sex that paint it as a negative force, and subsequently leads to the twisting of a positive, creative act into a negative expression of power and rape in those that accept those doctrines.

Porn is not at fault here, nor are its viewers. Those at fault in this crime are the producers and publishers, who were well aware of the abuses happening under their watch, and deceived their viewers into believing they were observing consensual performance acts. I hope that these women get every cent and more, and it would be excellent to see a class action suit from Pornhub's subscribers arise in tandem to and in support of their complaint.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Exactly, it's not too hard to find videos where you can see by their faces and sounds that they're having a good time. If they're not then it's a turn off

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] disposabletentacle@kbin.social 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This is why I stick to hentai. No traficking or coercion or questionable consent there, just a bunch of nerds doing what they love.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

But what is the prevalence of coercion in the industry? Is that known? Can it be known?

Most people I’ve heard speak about their experiences in the porn industry say this type of coercion is rare. GDP was a unique situation. Virtually everyone knew (or should have known) they were bad news for years before law enforcement got involved. I remember arguing with people about this. And actually one of the things people said was “who cares, this kind of thing is everywhere in the industry, they know what they’re getting into.” So I actually think that not only is there no evidence to support that, but this idea can even be harmful by painting the better behaved studios with a broad stroke, and giving the fewer bad actors cover to keep operating.

I think the best way to help sex workers, if this is something that concerns you, is to treat them with respect, call out the hateful stigma against their work, and support efforts to organize for worker protections. Despite the fact that most studios are not out there raping people left and right, like most industries, there is often a power imbalance between workers and owners and this sometimes leads to exploitation.

[–] loopedcandle@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 2 years ago (9 children)

I am a regular consumer of online porn. And I'll admit, I loved their videos. Now knowing what was going on, that's on me to do some thinking, i have probably watched a rape and helped the perpetrator make money from that act. That's hard on the conscience. I don't know what to think about it.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hate their videos, most of the girls always look bored or not into it, which is now clear why. That's why there's a rise in homemade, Indy models and couples putting up the best videos recently, cause you can tell the people involved are actually into it and enjoying it.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

These things move in cycles.

People want amateur porn.

Companies don't.

Amateur porn rises until it gets purged, then a few years later it rises again.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)

Alright, get rid of your phone. And whoa, if you have an iPhone, you might as well be pushing those Foxconn employees over the edge to their death. Everyone who bought a diamond is evil too. Do you love chocolate? You monster! Children most likely collected that. Clothes? My dear boy, you are supporting the exploitation of third world poors. Did you buy cheap veggies? Bloody psycho, you might as well be standing with a gun over the hordes of immigrants picking most of those for unliveable wages. Go to the cinema, watch a video on youtube, or listen to music on spotify, or vote for a conservative? How dare you support industries that have known child molesters, wage slaves, lobby for worse living standards, donate to hate groups, and and and?

"Oh, but that's involuntary, I need those to survive". Do you? Do you really? Did you need to buy a new phone? Is chocolate really necessary? Why don't you pick your own fruit? Music, video, and other pleasures aren't necessary to survive either.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Do you have an argument other than a tu quoque?

[–] winter@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's a lot of words for "I know, but I really don't want to give up my porn 😭"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)