this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
74 points (90.2% liked)

Videos

16556 readers
40 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 54 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It wasn't a design flaw. It was a deliberate decision on the part of Hyundai US to remove the immobiliser in the US as it was not a legal requirement there as it was in all other western markets. The exact same model sold in the EU, UK, Aus, Nz etc came with the immobiliser as standard. It saved Hyundai US about $20 per car...

[–] smallaubergine@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I also think its super dumb, but at Hyundai's scale, $20/car adds up to millions of dollars. Though conversely they're spending like $200 million to make up for all the thefts, higher insurance premiums, etc.

[–] derf82@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Don’t forget the massive damage to the Hyundai/Kia brands. I wouldn’t buy one with an immobilizer for fear someone would smash a window in a vain attempt to steal it.

I am sure the overall losses are higher than whatever they saved. The C suite is so often penny wise and pound foolish.

[–] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I wouldn't buy one because they've demonstrated flawed judgement when it comes to what features are worth paying for and which ones aren't. Where else is their cost cutting going to bite me in the ass?

[–] dog_@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It's like the Ford Pinto all over again.

[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You can just charge $20 more per car and break even.

[–] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

But you keep doing that and pretty soon you've got an $80,000 Kia.

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

That tells me that if you make the legal costs of this cost-cut more than $21 per car, those guys would stop selling cars without immobilisers.

Honestly, to me (a European, but I digress) this would be worth mandating a mass recall for. If yours hasn't been nicked yet, now would be a great time to send it to the dealer and have its immobilisation system be refitted from US to EU spec. If I was running a company that did this, the manager who approved that stunt would be fired and probably they're gonna have to talk to a lawyer.

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Hey, 20 dollars is 20 dollars. Don't kinkshame greed, it's a very powerful aphrodisiac! (For assholes, of course.)