this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
637 points (97.5% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (13 children)

Lol no Saudi is weaker than it ever has been. The Saudis know their military is shit and their people won’t do anything to preserve their regime if the Iranians come after them. With the U.S. pulling out of the Middle East since Afghanistan they are flailing about seeking treaties with the Chinese and the Russians to guarantee their safety. However the Russian military and their equipment have proven to be very shit. The Chinese talk a good game but they don’t have the military to project power overseas and most of their equipment is based on Russian garbage.

The US doesn’t need their oil as we are a net exporter now. They’ve also cut oil exports in the last year to try and prop up prices. There is also a very good chance they have passed peak oil production and simply can not produce more.

So what does Saudi have left to offer? Peace with Israel and a conclusion to the Palestinian conflict… maybe. At least that is what they are offering Blinken for an Alliance during their latest visit.

Don’t let the article fool you the Saudis are weak and know they are in trouble without US guarantees of peace.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Do you really think the media would do that? Just outright lie to benefit their capitalist overlords?

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Dont do that. The Guardian is a pretty good source. Yes they are alarmist at times, but they're the last UK newspaper to lick a boot.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The problem is systematic. It didn't take long for BBC to go from respectable journalism to trans genocide.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The BBC has reported the official line since time immemorial. Their director is now more pro-fascist than ever, but the Guardian is not the mouth-piece of the government as the BBC was, and have had their offices raided numerous times.

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Alright you've convinced me. They don't attack journalists who are on the side of evil.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Eh, while they are a good publication overall, the Guardian is the definition of permitted dissent.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)