this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
281 points (93.2% liked)

Sysadmin

10719 readers
16 users here now

A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration

No generic Lemmy issue posts please! Posts about Lemmy belong in one of these communities:
!lemmy@lemmy.ml
!lemmyworld@lemmy.world
!lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
!support@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sallp@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (3 children)

If it is for internal only, self signed is a lot easier.

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Also probably no sysadmin uses it, but the Gemini protocol requires the use of a self signed cert

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hard disagree. As long as you have any machine with internet access it’s trivial, even more so if you can use DNS challenge.

[–] SomeKindaName@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You're absolutely correct. For self hosting at home I use cloudflare for DNS challenges.

Caddy is also amazing at making things even simpler.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So is using "pass" as the password to all of your sensitive systems. Still not best, or even good practice.

[–] JWBananas@startrek.website 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Are you conflating self-signed and untrusted?

Self-signed is fine if you have a trusted root deployed across your environment.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 years ago

Correct. If using actual pki with a trusted root and private CA, you're just fine.

I took the statement to mean ad-hoc self-signed certs, signed by the server that they are deployed on. That works for EiT but defeats any MitM protection, etc.