this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
161 points (98.2% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
2 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] mholiv@lemmy.world 65 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (15 children)

Good god no.

Getting my own modem and using my own router was the only way I could:

  1. Get a non CG-NAT IPv4 address
  2. Set up port forwarding for my ipv4 stack
  3. set up firewall rules for my ipv6 stack
  4. Use a non trash tier wireless access point.

The box they gave me had no configuration options outside of renaming the SSID and was only able to do dual stack light. Ridiculous.

[โ€“] towerful@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago (8 children)

I can understand that if they are selling gigabit fibre, deploying optional modem-only installs, and having inexperienced users complaining they aren't getting gigabit speeds because they are using some โ‚ฌ15 mini tplink WiFi AP thing, then having to trouble shoot that and potentially look like the bad guys by saying "the hardware you have bought is trash".
I would get mad about that if I had to support that.
Maintaining some sort of "minimum requirements" or "only supported hardware" list considering there are SSSOOOO many routers out there (never mind whitebox openwrt/opnsense/pfsense/mikrotik/raw-linux whatever) is impossible.
And Intel pcie 4-port gigabit cards are so commonly counterfeits (especially on eBay, for those enthusiasts) which could throw so many issues before it even gets to os/userland.

I don't know what the Router Freedom thing is. Sounds amazing to me based on the name (and knowing the EU).
I can understand why ISPs might get antsy when stuff has to run gigabit wirespeed.
But maybe "we only guarantee wirespeed on our hardware"... but if the hardware they are providing is just a modem, it might be hard to remotely debug and provide support.
I think I'm rambling.

[โ€“] Username@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago

Lol, my super old second hand 20โ‚ฌ Archer C7 with OpenWRT has better WiFi speeds than the supplied Fiber Router/Modem.

Imagine that, it has real antennas!

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)