this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
155 points (91.4% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4283 readers
136 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

All targeting solutions for sublight speed are computable.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MinusPi@yiffit.net 47 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It takes a hell of a lot more than a single clock cycle to run a targeting algorithm.

[–] Crass_Spektakel@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yep, around 200. The Missile meanwhile travels 0,2mm

[–] MinusPi@yiffit.net 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Source? I'd estimate thousands to millions of cycles.

[–] Jajcus@kbin.social 16 points 2 years ago

Not everything has to be computed in every computation cycle. Most things are already pre-computed and the operations to do the corrections would mostly be simple additions and multiplications.

[–] Crass_Spektakel@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Written in hand coded assembler language: Maybe 100 cycles. Actually Quake from 1997 used a very similar prediction for network coding and not joking, it took less than 60 cycles and the very same code has been used to guide the IRIS-T system - which by the way uses an 1.4Ghz ARM Quadcore.

Written in Dotnet: Your computer is to old. No matter which computer.

[–] Im_old@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

So they wrote Starfield in .net? /j