this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
59 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
itsPina@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net
59
Lol (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 years ago by hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Elon_Musk@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yea it's funny. But you know what they are trying to say.

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

I really have no idea what they meant.

[–] Melonius@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The only way I can read it in a generous light is they are claiming Russia is over focusing on the front line to ensure no "victories" can be claimed.

That might hint that should a front line position be lost the fallback lines are not well defended? The other implication is that lots of "damage" is being done with no land gains? But I am just guessing what they mean and if it's the second point, yuck.