this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
169 points (84.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

32410 readers
1 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"The only difference between programming and games is that games have win conditions."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago (12 children)

Games don't always have win conditions..

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

Games by their literal definition have win conditions.

One without win conditions is just a virtual toy. Like sim city.

I wrote a paper on this when studying games technology at university. It's actually a really interesting area of study.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

A game has a set of goals, and you can quit it without dying.

If there's no set of goals, it's not a game, it's a toy.

If you can't quit it without dying, it's not a game, it's real life.

(Does real life have a set of goals? Depends who you ask.)

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Huh. Turns out I use most of my games as toys, not games. I rarely finish games, usually getting a lot of stuff done, high leveled, etc, then just enjoying it until I decide ro start over. I also regularly go back to games like Ark, 7 days, City Skylines, Civ VI(but often strip out ein conditions so I can keep playing), FFXIV, etc.

Sure I make short term goals that I complete, but usually not done everything and complete story to win unless doing so gives me something else to do, like New Game+.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)