this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
89 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

40257 readers
496 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've generally been against giving AI works copyright, but this article presented what I felt were compelling arguments for why I might be wrong. What do you think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone 71 points 2 years ago (27 children)

"Intellectual property" is a silly concept that only exists because under capitalism massive powerful corporations benefit if they can leverage the legal system to permeantly keep knowledge, innovation, and art behind a paywall, and people in society are dependent on monetary gain to survive.

We should, to the fullest extent of the law, make it such that proper credit is given to people who make things, but calling something "theft" when the person you're "stealing" from literally does not lose anything is asinine.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They lose remuneration for their work.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If I was never going to remunerate them they aren't losing shit.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Companies like Denuvo make a shit load of money because that statement is blatantly untrue. They essentially make games be delayed in being pirated, which does objectively increase sales.

load more comments (24 replies)