this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
594 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
74055 readers
4677 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I bough a TP-Link smart bulb once. It was very nice - I could just download a "tp link bulb client" written for everyone by some third-party dude. If I wanted to, I could add a desktop shortcut to turn on/off the bulb.
Then TP-Link decided to automatically update the firmware of the bulb without my knowledge. The update turned off the REST API that made the third-party client to work. I could only use the shitty MOBILE app from then on.
The update was impossible to revert (though TP-Link said "Ok write to our support and we'll give you the downgrade file" no fuck you).
Ever since I've vowed to heavily think whether I want to buy a non-open-source firmware smart device ever again. Recently I bought a smart bulb and two smart sockets that come pre-flashed with "Tasmota" and "WLED" firmware out of the factory and they work great.
And I OWN them too
Many years ago i bought an RGB LED and naively thought the remote signal must have some standard protocol, because it is so simple commands that would allow for some cool shit if automated. Oh boy was i wrong. Proprietary smart home software is the most insane. How on earth should your home become "smart" when it is locked into some ideology (manufacturer) or worse yet you have multiple "parties" fighting over the government causing a shutdown.
NGL you kinda went into left field at the end there, but I still agree.
i wanted to compare the issue with the principles of government and the structures needed,because that what smart home should be, organizing your home to certain effect.
And like with state government that requires transparent and consistent rules, cooperation of the different branches and accountability.
That doesn't sound like it was impossible, it sounds like you just didn't want to do it.
Factually, it was how you described. Poetically, it was making my life as a customer unnecessarily difficult to the point where the word "impossible" is a valid form of artistic expression. I didn't want to have to beg anybody to please unlock the device I paid for.
https://community.home-assistant.io/t/tp-link-offers-way-to-add-local-api-back
Please be advised that I intentionally cherry-picked the comments that support my point, as I was just skimming the thread.
There is esphome too, it's not used a lot by fabricant yet, but still exist and compatiblr with all devices using an esp as chip.
Pi-hole.
My two top-blocked domains are related to TP-Link.
While I can’t always get local-only devices, I can at least separate their traffic and block the shit out of them.
Why do they do this shit? Is "User A turned their lights on at 9 AM" that valuable of data that they'd disable third party shit?
I guess it's because it's "insecure". Any device on the network could control the lights. Tasmota allows setting a password for the control panel though.