this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
545 points (93.0% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
4281 readers
9 users here now
Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!
Rules:
- Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
- No spam or soliciting for money.
- No racism or other bigotry allowed.
- Obviously nothing illegal.
If you see these please report them.
Related communities:
For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
EVs suddenly don’t get good fuel economy?
I mean, with EVs, you compare the economy to other EVs.
Well… we don’t have info… so…
That’s an estimate.
Even so, that’s better than the F150 Lightning (1.9 mi/kWh) and the Rivian R1T (1.81 mi/kWh)
That's what my Chevy bolt gets on the highway in winter.
The cybertruck would use, according to at least one estimate, about 350 Wh/km, which puts it as the least efficient EV (including an old source). Compares to about an F-150 Lightning.
Man I need those numbers converted to mi/kwh
Satoshis per yard/h
1.78 mi/kwh
Darn that's less than half of what I get
That's a lot. Looked up numbers for high-speed rail: for passangers minimum is 29Wh/km/sest in Japan and maximum is 41Wh/km/seat for Eurostar, for freight it's between 315Wh/km/t and 525Wh/km/t. Again, this is for high-speed rail at least 300km/h. For slow speed train(for example 90km/h) this will go much, much lower. Probably something between 30 and 100Wh/km/t.
If it's a new car, then it's less efficient than your old car. This is still true (or possibly even more true) for electric cars.