this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
1103 points (84.4% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thantik@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

I hate both of them equally and with a vile passion. Having to share walls with other families is just as inhumane. I don't know why "Urban Sprawl" is such a looked down upon term. I'd much rather cities start as a central hub, and then urban sprawl outwards with minor hubs surrounding them every 100 miles or so.

This whole -- either everyone has to be packed like sardines, or everyone has to have 5 acres per house crap is annoying. Give the nation some medium density housing. We have the fucking internet now, half the people can work from home. You don't need to be walking-distance from everything.

[–] door_in_the_face@feddit.nl 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, occasionally hearing your neighbors is just as inhumane as having no shelter, water and heating.

[–] thantik@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

You've obviously never actually lived in one of these places. They regularly have infestations, dirty water, and no heating due to the types of people they house and the "affordable" nature of them which generally causes lack of upkeep once built. Which can be, yes -- just as inhumane as living in a tent.

In addition, it removes the potential for ownership away from the people living there, in an effort to rent-seek and make sure they own nothing for as long as they live.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

the types of people they house

That's gonna be a yikes from me, scoob

[–] thantik@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

How is that a yikes? We're talking about poverty here, it is a class of people which regularly lack the same benefits in society as others, so there's higher instances of drug use, crime, etc. You know in conversation, it's occasionally useful to classify things with a broad brush so you can talk about overarching issues and how to solve them without being prejudiced, right?

[–] door_in_the_face@feddit.nl 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not gonna dox myself here bg linking my adress, but rest assured: I have been living in apartments all my adult life, and it's been fine. The problems you describe are not inherent to apartments but rather the way landlords handle things. With better regulations and organizations that help renters assert their rights, it can be a good way to house people.

[–] thantik@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I agree that we're incredibly overdue for regulations in these areas. Since the mid 90s it's been deregulation, privitization, deregulation, privitization. A healthy capitalistic society can only survive with regulations which govern how absolutely atrocious capitalists can be. If they could sell you rat poison as food to make a dollar, they certainly would. My guess is that these kind of apartment complexes are probably better in less city-centric areas where the construction is newer. Unfortunately all I see going up around here is wood-frame apartment complexes, and they are clearly inferior to block/prefab concrete.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Not when done properly. Two poorer Eastern European countries have 90+% of their citizens living in government owned housing that costs them 2% of their monthly income. The apartments are modern, well maintained, and preferable to home ownership because 2% rent. IIRC it's Estonia and Lithuania, but I may be wrong there.

[–] Illegal_Prime@dmv.social 4 points 2 years ago

What you seems to be describing is Single-Family Housing. True medium density is actually really compact, using lots for more efficient housing and including public green space.

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

How is it inhumane? Have you only ever lived in apartments made of paper walls?

[–] thantik@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Have...you sat there and thought about what you're asking? What "affordable housing" complexes do you know that aren't made out of paper walls? That's the "affordable" part.

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Come to the Netherlands, where I’m from, social housing apartments are made of brick and concrete with thick walls. No shitty 5 over 1 stick building apartments in my country.

Also social housing apartments in my country are always mixed in between owner occupied apartments of different price ranges. So the buildings are of high quality and maintained.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Two poorer Eastern European countries have 90%+ of their citizens living in government owned housing. It costs them 2% of their monthly income. They prefer the apartments because the government built them properly, so they are modern, and well maintained. Oh, year and the rent is 2% of your income.