this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
28 points (96.7% liked)

Australia

4450 readers
178 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This week, I will be the first person to be prosecuted for protesting against Woodside’s Burrup project. This is the story of the raid on my home and the six-month wait for a hearing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nath@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

She herself raised the issue of the art gallery and complained she was being called a vandal. I was saying that yes: she literally vandalised a piece of art. She's a vandal by definition.

As to the raid itself, it's clearly in response to the attack on the Woodside CEOs private residence. Showing up at someone's home, inviting the media to film you as you allegedly damage the house, scare a family inside at 6:30 in the morning and attempt to lock yourself to the house are acts that take you into unlawful territory if found guilty. That's what she is on trial for.

Nobody had a problem when they were standing out the front of the Woodside building holding signs. That's peaceful protest.

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

And that achieved nothing.

This is only more signs that peaceful protests are simply a tool for government to ignore.

Direct action is needed, and hero’s like this are starting to lead that change.

The criminals are those killing us all under the protection of a system they designed to shield them from repercussions.

[–] Nath@aussie.zone -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So, now we're acknowledging that she wasn't protesting peacefully like she claims? That indeed she crossed the line into unlawful territory?

I agree.

That's why the police are involved. Not because she protested Woodside.

[–] Marsupial@quokk.au 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nah, we’re acknowledging they “lawful” is a bullshit metric.

It’s lawful to kill the planet and us along with it, it’s illegal to bring attention to those who are doing it.

Clearly one cannot operate under such a deeply flawed system.

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 0 points 2 years ago

As I said at the outset: I'm sympathetic to the cause. I have grave concerns about the planet and how as a species, we are causing immeasurable damage with our reckless treatment of resources. Nobody is defending the company nor denying she has a worthy goal at heart.

But all of that is beside the point. The point is her central premise is deeply flawed: she is simply not on trial for protesting Woodside.