this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Reddit Migration
104 readers
1 users here now
### About Community Tracking and helping #redditmigration to Kbin and the Fediverse. Say hello to the decentralized and open future. To see latest reeddit blackout info, see here: https://reddark.untone.uk/
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They also suspended all our accounts for 7 days.
As the original creator and designer of the logo and banner, I also filed a DMCA against the further use of the r/TIHI logo on reddit.
"As the original creator and designer of the logo and banner, I also filed a DMCA against the further use of the r/TIHI logo on reddit."
Thanks, I Love It.
Unfortunately that has no chance of succeeding. When you sign up to reddit, you give them a license to use the content you submit. It's in the user agreement, section 5 "Your Content": https://www.redditinc.com/policies/user-agreement
This doesn't hold any grounds in the EU as copyrights can't be waived, and unless you got paid for it, you can withdraw consent at any time.
You don't waive your copyright. You grant a license to reddit to use your content.
Read the link, it's all there:
This doesn't apply unless you got compensated for your work. Reddit can add anything they like in their agreements, but that won't hold in court.
The artist can withdraw consent at any time.
You are confused. What you are describing applies to transferring copyright, not for granting a license while retaining the copyright.
If things worked the way you described, free software, for example licensed through the GPL, couldn't exist because then the authors could always take away the users' rights by retroactively revoking their license. Fortunately, it doesn't work that way.
There are cases where artists withdrew consent and their work had to be taken down, and to my knowledge all contracts can be amended or cancelled, especially if they're exploitative like reddits. You have a right to compensation if they profit off of your creative work, be it artwork, music, or writing.
The DMCA is used "successfully" with even less grounds on YouTube every day. But I suppose the difference lies in not being a mega corporation.
Yeah, the DMCA only works one way :(
Under GDPR you have the right to your content, including data download and revocation. If you are banned from or restricted access to a website it doesn't strip you of that right. However the complain should have probably been through GDPR and not DMCA.
No, under the GDPR you don't have the right to have your content removed. You have the right to have personally identifiable data removed, things like names, IP addresses, phone numbers, ...
I'll link to the EU website that explains what they mean with personal data below, but I don't think a logo qualifies under their definition.
https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/reform/what-personal-data_en
Yeah, I just don't get why this misinformation is so wide-spread. Under GDPR you don't own shit, it's for protecting your personal information. That's all.
In 7 days I'm going to speedrun a permanent account ban.
Just say that you'll kill and eat Matt Walsh if you were locked on a room with him, worked for me
I want to try something... Less involved in getting me on more lists.
Honestly, people posting unrelated trash to subreddits with new moderators would be good. A dozen new moderators against thousands of non-bots just posting shit to reddit would be fun to try to moderate.
Not even rule breaking stuff so you can contribute more than once. Like submitting wikihow articles for laying down floor tiles in TIHI. and upvoting other posts that don't belong.
Reporting misinformation in r/conservative (in good faith) worked for me.
Nah, that shit just got me banned from specific reddits. You have to make a joke about eating one of their idols.
r/conservative mods are unique in that they retaliate by claiming it's "report abuse."
https://piped.video/watch?v=zIoqlLU4E74