this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

19254 readers
129 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![]()

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

it also consumes way more filament- especially on single-wall parts or parts that have x perimeters rather than a perimeter thickness. They're great for structural prints, and large prints that you want done quickly. For comparison, a .4mm nozzle will have a nozzle area of about 0.125 mm^2, where a 0.6mm is .28 mm^2. and .8mm is .502mm^2. More than double the extrusion width.

like basically everything else in 3d printing, it's all about compromise and which compromises are acceptable.

[–] ShadowRam@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No, I don't agree with consumes 'way more' filament.

If your design calls for 1mm width wall. You're doing two passes with a 0.4 nozzle (0.5 width x2) or one pass with a 0.8 nozzle (1 width x1)

It's the same plastic.

You'll use more plastic on the infill, but you could arguably use a lower % infill if the infill wall thickness is larger.

So you could be using more plastic overall, but I don't think it would qualify as 'way more'.. maybe like 10% to 20% more.