this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
197 points (99.0% liked)
Work Reform
13342 readers
291 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So it would have been better to you that there was no minimum wage increase? This was a bill that was passed back in 2014, she won it 6 months after being first elected because local liberals were spooked. The current fights with union efforts she is involved in are calling for $30.
So in your opinion tenants would be better off with or without proctections. Again she was working with the rest of the city council and didn't get everything she wanted. She recently put forth a bill for rent control and only one democrat voted with her, "progressives" voted no or didn't show up for the vote.
Again the situation would be so much worse.
I'm gonna group up your last two points as they are one in the same. Do you really think an out and open socialist has no skin in the game? A political group that has a history of violent state oppression against them? Do you think the union busting Seattle Times has an ax to pick with socialists, the media have gone to exorbitant lengths to paint her in a bad light.
All of your arguments are boiled down to "Yeah but it'd all be worse without her!" Which I fundamentally disagree. There's roughly zero chance I can convince you she's a worthless moron, and you won't convince me she's anything more than that, so let's just agree to disagree.
It's fine that we disagree, it is just wild to me that you are in favor of unionizing everywhere but diametrically opposed to a person actively engaging in making it happen.
The full episode is out now and I would be really interested on hearing your thoughts on it, if you want to give it the time.