UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1464 readers

1 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.

New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide

Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.

Community Spotlight

Useful Links

Community Rules

Follow the Code of Conduct.
Posts must be on-topic.
No duplicate posts.
No commercial activity.
No memes.
Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.

Other Communities

!uapmemes@lemmy.world

If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SignullGone@lemmy.world

HM05_Me@lemmy.world

NASA UAP Independent Study Team Report (science.nasa.gov)

submitted 2 years ago by SignullGone@lemmy.world to c/uap@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Imb4 "that sounds like math, I'm ignoring that and have decided it's a coverup"

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think you'd be surprised to find out that most people would accept the results. What most people want, or at least what I want, is this kind of analysis. Removing junk data is always a good thing as you can shift your focus on the truly anomalous cases.

There are plenty of cases on https://www.aaro.mil/, but unfortunately, the sensor data is classified and not available to the public. We are stuck with blurry videos and testimony.

[–] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hopefully Galileo Project sensor data will be of a better quality with nearby systems corroborating observations.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

That's my hope as well.