this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
41 points (93.6% liked)

Hacker News

4123 readers
2 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nyoooom@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Looks like 10.65g, which is quite a lot but probably sustainable for a very short period of time and with training

EDIT: I'M FUCKING WRONG AND USED m/s INSTEAD OF km/h

[–] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Not even close.

100km/h = 27.8 m/s

27.8 m/s ÷ .956 s = 29.1 m/s^2

29.1m/s^2 ÷ 9.8m/s^2 = 2.96G

[–] nyoooom@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Ah shit you're right, I probably used 100m/s instead of km/h, makes so much more sense

[–] Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

Not sure that the acceleration curve is straight line, but because time is less than a second, it might not make that much difference to g-forces.