this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
66 points (97.1% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

turned to ribbons by the concrete? planes are light and flamable shrug-outta-hecks where are the wings in this crash? most they found was like a 2 meter span of a wingtip

[–] Sephitard9001@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

On the WTC, the impact of the wings is clearly visible on the building. There is literally no indication whatsoever the Pentagon was hit by a winged aircraft.

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 34 points 2 years ago (3 children)

they're different buildings. there isnt a huge corpus of airliner impacts in the side of building-holes to reasonably assume all kinds of buildings would leave wing-marks

[–] Sphere@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

From reading other parts of this thread, as it happens, I just found out that said corpus is larger than you might think

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

weird how the bomber did the no-wing hole while the tiny SR20 made one more plane-shaped.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)