this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
66 points (97.1% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

The big issue with that is the hole isn't wide enough to account for wings, and there's no wing or engine wreckage on the lawn. So where did the wings go?

anyway I think that's the part that raises the biggest questions for me

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

turned to ribbons by the concrete? planes are light and flamable shrug-outta-hecks where are the wings in this crash? most they found was like a 2 meter span of a wingtip

[–] Sephitard9001@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

On the WTC, the impact of the wings is clearly visible on the building. There is literally no indication whatsoever the Pentagon was hit by a winged aircraft.

[–] cosecantphi@hexbear.net 18 points 2 years ago

The outer walls of the WTC buildings were pretty much mostly glass, right? Whereas the Pentagon is supposed to be fortified.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)