Not a commie, but didn't the Norwegian people nationalize the oil production, leasing it out to companies while keeping a huge share of the profit for the welfare of common Norwegians?

My understanding is that, in a sense, that is exactly what seizing the means of production is about.

[–] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Means: seized.

Snow: plowed.

Lute: fisked.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 years ago

Hotel: Trivago.

[–] w2qw@aussie.zone 14 points 2 years ago

Controlling the natural resources a country and leasing it out it private companies is pretty standard practice in most non corrupt countries. Norway probably differs in that they capture more of the economic rent in part due to a more efficient tax and a share of public ownership.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That sounds to me more like a merger of corporation and state.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago

Nope. The people making these policies laid the plans for nationalizing the natural resources of Norway while in German concentration camps, where they were sent precisely because they were socialists. They are the primary reason, along with the discovery of oil and gas, for Norway being one of the richest countries on earth per capita. That the extraction of natural resources is under democratic control and under a somewhat high taxation scheme is not evidence of a fascist state-corp merger, but something that should be the default in all countries around the world to combat imperialist capital interests (except that the taxes should be even higher).