this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
211 points (97.7% liked)
World News
32285 readers
1 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
200w capacity in 1 square meter ? rather use windmills instead (especially offshore)
Or just put them in places where people can't live easily, like the desert, which is what's being done. Also, we can do both!
excessive heat makes panel inefficient. they need to be cool to reach maximum efficiency (at 26°c) .. might as well install them offshore..but still, remote place is best place
Good point!
solar actually gets a greater power density. most wind projects in the US get about 2.5 MW/km^2
ie 250w per square meter, but it doesnt get affected by heat.1 square km could then host 2Mw of solar and 2.5Mw of wind. I always wondered how efficient wind is. according to google, a windmill produces 3 Gwh per year, some read 8Gwh, idk what to believe. i would be interested if there were more estate efficient form of renewable