this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
99 points (99.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Saw a new 20-story development is going up nearby and checked out prices. Mao should have killed more landlords.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No idea, unfortunately. Market rate is generally around $1800/mo, I'd imagine this would have been less (maybe $1200-$1500?) because it was kinda old (I want to say late 70s/early 80s).

[–] regul@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They replaced a single family house with 20 units?

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, they replaced an old 3-story apartment building (maybe 15 units?) with a 20-floor tower, I think around 100 units.

[–] regul@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Oh. 20-floor, I read 20 unit.

Wow that's a lot of housing!

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It would be good if it were remotely affordable, lol.

[–] regul@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Eh. The people who are going to live in these units would still be living in your city, they'd just be living in a different building. I'd prefer we were replacing single-family homes with 20-story apartment buildings instead of replacing naturally affordable stuff (affordable usually just because it's old and shitty), but if you're getting more than 4x the units I'd probably take that trade.

I know most people on Hexbear disagree with me about that, though.

[–] jonne 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Housing or investment? If nobody can afford to buy or rent there, they either end up being bought by overseas buyers as a money laundering effort, or they're turned into short term rentals.

[–] regul@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Condos are not a great investment. High carrying cost and slow appreciation. Especially in new buildings. They used to get bought by Chinese buyers looking to park money overseas because domestic options were not great, but the party cracked down on that. Foreign buyers were always kind of an overstated boogeyman.

And short term rentals are a solved problem. NY just basically made them illegal. Since you can make those rule changes retroactively it's better to have the housing built already than the alternative.

[–] tripartitegraph@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What do you mean by "retroactively" in your second paragraph?

[–] regul@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago

AirBNB was allowed, now it's not. I don't know if existing AirBNBs get to stay, but you could just as easily write the law so that they can't.