this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
124 points (99.2% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just reposting this excellent point from lemmygrad

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flan@hexbear.net 21 points 2 years ago (42 children)
[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (39 children)

I think it's a reference to "getting the wall" aka summary execution aka one of the great crimes against humanity perpetrated by revolutionaries in the past that is cause for understandable distrust among leftist non-communists especially, anarchists like myself, whose philosophical comrades were among the murdered.

OP, please don't go there. We're better than that and don't have to repeat the tragedies of the past.

EDIT: To try to reduce the friendly fire, I did not recognize that this image was from the Romanovs.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 42 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (16 children)

You think it was bad that the tzar got Merced? While it's sad that his children got killed, it was also politically expedient. We've seen time and time again that allowing the royal line to continue is just begging for counter-revolution or the occurrence of a government-in-exile. The tzar and his family benefitted from a system (which they maintained themselves) that killed children daily. The royal family encouraged pogroms.
While the murder of the inheritors of the Romanov line is regrettable, it is in no way some "great crime".

[–] ElHexo@hexbear.net 28 points 2 years ago

Only two of them were actually children too (13 and 17)

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)
load more comments (39 replies)