this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
65 points (97.1% liked)

Canada

10304 readers
1314 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Do you want to kill the internet? This is how you kill the internet.

This is how you isolate your journalism industry to get zero traffic

[–] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Seems like that would hurt Canadian journalism rather than kill the internet?

[–] Overzeetop@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The whole idea the internet is interlinked sites. Then again the whole idea if the internet was also a robust, reliable, multi-nodal, non-corporate architecture for redundant transmission of data, so we’re headed into the shitter already.

But, more to the point, if you start charging people for links you break the purpose of being able to link things. It will kill Canadian journalism first, but it will wound a portion of the internet in the process. And if it spreads it will do net harm to both sides, everywhere.

[–] karlhungus@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago
  1. You already are charged by Google the price is your data and ads
  2. The target is 1 billion dollar + entities (based on my skim)

Just like the original comment this seems like wild overstatement.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If these websites were someone's blog linking to a news article, I'd agree. They're not and they're not merely linking content. This isn't the open web, it's not the internet. These are platforms with captive audiences. Once you put that in the thought process, it flips the argument on its head.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 0 points 2 years ago

And if Facebook and Google simply refuse to link to the sites that charge the money to link to them. What will happen then?

[–] bradmont@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Facebook and Google have already destroyed the internet, by making hundreds of millions of people think they are the internet.