this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)
GenZedong
8 readers
1 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
Serious posts can be posted here and/or in /c/GenZhou.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information.
Rules:
- This community is explicitly pro-AES (China, Cuba, the DPRK, Laos and Vietnam)
- No ableism, racism, misogyny, transphobia, etc.
- No pro-imperialists, liberals or electoralists
- No dogmatism/idealism (Trotskyism, Gonzaloism, Hoxhaism, anarchism, etc.)
- Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Okay, this is just stupid. I kind of get the usual "argument" about dictators, but specificallykings? What level of propaganda is this? Literally look at Romanovs and the Chinese monarchs, and then look at UK, Sweden, Japan, Norway, and every other capitalist shithole with a monarch in the seat
Anarchist mode breath in
"What about Castroite monarchy?"
Anarchist mode breath out
The
What?
They had the state, Raul was leader after Fidel, ergo MONARCHY. Checkmate tankies.
They’ll probably refer to the DPRK and specifically the Kims as ‘evidence’ for their accusation.
Again, I would understand if it was an attempt to claim Marxists like "dictators". This is usually what is used against Stalin, Mao, Kims. But the word "king" has a very specific meaning, with clear attributes