this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2026
443 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

15554 readers
794 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The nearly 1,200-metre bridge is said to be the longest bridge in the world that will exclusively serve pedestrians, cyclists and trams.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

However, there was widespread debate over whether the bridge should also be open to passenger vehicle traffic. Sazonov noted that large city projects often raise a good deal of heated debate, adding that he thinks residents will come to embrace the bridge.

He puts it very politely but you can bet your ass the car brains kicked up a huge stink over this. Every tiny bit of progress towards more human centric city planning is always vehemently opposed by vested interests that weaponise the stupidity and resistance to change of "conservatives". Any progress is hard won and yes I'll keep calling out the idiots who resist it.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 1 points 1 hour ago

Finland doesn't have a domestic car industry, so the push back was probably quite limited

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Sorry, I must've forgotten that paragraph while I was replying. My understanding having read about this a couple years back is that controversy was pretty frontloaded ("originally controversial") and that the debate did, like in most any large infrastructure project, continue for years after. That is, I think drivers care and are disappointed about this but aren't losing their minds over it.

Even beside that, if every carbrain across Helsinki were coping and seething right now, I think my overall point stands that turning every victory for good into a focus on how pissed "the enemy" must surely be right now isn't at all healthy or productive.