this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
377 points (94.6% liked)
Not The Onion
21253 readers
1689 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The punks ~~were~~ are extremely LGBTQ+ acceptant, even as far back as the 60s and 70s
Queercore
That’s part of what ~~made~~ makes them so fucking hot… all that leather? Are you kidding me?
🤯 I was today years old when I learned that...
If punk was "extremely LGBTQ+ acceptant", then they did they have to create an offshoot? 🤔
If television viewers were accepting of cooking then why did they have to create a subgenre of cooking shows?
That... doesn't make sense. Viewers don't make new shows.
Ok. Your question also didn't make sense.
Stop it with your relentless “logic”!
Hahaha. It was a stretch to be sure. The point is one doesn't need to be exclusive of the other.
Shame on you for not recognizing a famous line from Futurama! 😛
Man, I'm old and too uncool for Lemmy.
sorry, I guess I'm also too old to make a good joke ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I don’t think you understand punk
There’s no “have to” about it
I don't, which is why I posted the question.