this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
910 points (98.5% liked)
Microblog Memes
11342 readers
2626 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Inheritance should be illegal.
It's financial nepotism and I'd rather a society based on equality where nobody has an unfair advantage over anyone else.
It should be illegal to provide for your family? Every man for themself?
Assuming the most generous interpretation of your statement I still think it's putting the cart before the horse. Generationally accrued wealth is currently one of the only paths out of destitution for many people. Inheritance should be unnecessary but until such a time as adequate housing is guaranteed familial property has to be a thing. (I wouldn't be on board even in a proper post-scarcity society, homes are more than just places and personal property is accepted in all but the most extreme interpretations of socialism.)
Inheritance beyond a set amount should be illegal. Billionaires passing on billions of dollars is just wrong.
$100 million cap on all inheritance. $500 million cap on total wealth. Anything beyond that is taxed at 100%.
Any attempt to "donate" the money to a family-controlled "charity" triggers a tax on the entire wealth at 90%.
That's something I can agree with. I think there's a very reasonable compromise somewhere between "children can't have a better life than their parents" and "five families own everything forever, including several governments." $500 million still seems pretty damn high I'd cut that to 50 or even 5.
The problem is selling the law to the lower middle class because they all believe they can get this rich and the tax will affect them.
I'd rather have a higher than it should be limit and reach the 0.01% obscenely rich than have the law beaten to death.
$5 mil is somewhat achievable. While bad, they aren't as bad as those who have $5 BILLION in assets.
Someone who have $5 million has more in common with the poor than those who have $5 billion.
I think that's horseshit and has been for a long time now. The middle class no longer believes they can become ultra wealthy. It's an excuse that's now used for why taxes against the upper class never happen and that's BULLSHIT. The real reason is the people in charge of raising taxes on the ultra rich are being paid by the ultra rich to NOT do that.
I haven't thought about the subject too deeply, so I'll just interject a consideration. Are you thinking about the situation from a purely individualistic point of view, in which families live completely apart? Intergenerational units are more common in some cultures than others, with everyone contributing to the same household. It would be the same reasoning of spouses getting an inheritance, but you might be against that as well.
That's a Robin Hood logic. It's childish...
It shouldn't be illegal but heavily taxed, why should some dude get a pass in life because his grandparents were gangsters? That's how you get kings (/billionaires).
Inheritance is fundamental consequence of private ownership - you have right to do whatever with things you own.
When you're dead, you are incapable of making choices. Giving rights to dead people is an awful idea, and we should stop pretending it makes sense.
So, you can just distribute your wealth to your offspring shortly before your death. Inheritance system is just convenient extension set up just in case you won't be able to distribute it before your death. It all comes from right to own private property.
And they would pay income tax on it, just as they do if you were to give your wealth to them before you die today. That is fine. Having property rights when you are alive is fine. Having rights to a dead person's property with tax avoidance is not.
Not in my jurisdiction. All direct wealth transfers between parents and children are tax free here. You can literally give your house to your kid, and they are new owner for free.
Same with inheritance. Closest members of family pay no inheritance tax at all.
In the U.S., the gifter has to pay federal gift tax. If you transfer a million dollar property, it will be taxed at 40%. Federal inheritance tax has an exemption up to $14 million.
It's fucked up that you can inherit say, apartment after your parents and you can't just give that apartment to your children so they can start their families. If they want their own they have no choice but to get long term mortgage.
Totally, at least anything over some medium amount.
According to who, exactly?
Well if I work and give money to my kids that's quite fair IMO (normal work, no billionaire "work"), so in the 10k range, and then pile taxes upon it.