this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
893 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

83929 readers
2881 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] phx@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I mean, for the most part yes. I'm not even so much concerned about my kids viewing porn, more so than somebody else will make nasty deepfakes of them and post online etc, so age verification won't fix that.

I could see it help with discriminating between people at their "own damn computers" and bots or misinformation/psyops campaigns run out of certain foreign countries though (assuming any ID also ties back to parent country).

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

I could see it help with discriminating between people at their “own damn computers” and bots or misinformation/psyops campaigns run out of certain foreign countries though (assuming any ID also ties back to parent country).

It won't unless they can prevent people from stealing IDs. Which they can't.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mate, they can't even stop scammers faking a caller ID. This will do absolutely nothing against bad faith actors.

[–] phx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think it's less a matter of "can't" and more a matter of "can't ... be added to bother putting in a significant effort/investment"

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 2 days ago

So why do you think this will be any different?

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

we already have laws for all those issues you mentioned but there is no profit in the way they are currently enforced. this bill will create massive profit opportunities and kill off a ton of the little guys; for fb etc it’s competition squishing essentially.