this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
596 points (99.3% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

9761 readers
200 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this. If the reason is in the source but is tedious to find (e.g. in a lengthy video), you must add an explanation for where it is.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources (for a rough idea, check out this list), and posts should retain the title (if one exists) from works like news articles, videos, etc. You may (but need not) edit your post if the source changes the title. Other types of posts should have a title which accurately, relatively neutrally describes their contents.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal. Within moderator discretion, this doesn't just include reposts of the exact same media but also includes e.g. a secondary source telling basically the exact same story as another that was already posted.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

True story: Bruce Jenner was an active race car driver in the 90s. The series he participated in was the Trans Am series.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I understand that your comment relies on the understanding that Caitlyn Jenner's deadname is Bruce Jenner, that the joke is that she participated in a racing series that's nearly "Am Trans", and that she went by Bruce when she was actively racing.

To avoid deadnaming, I'd still ask that you use language like "Caitlyn Jenner (formerly Bruce Jenner) was [...]" and "The series she participated in [...]" (or something similar). I totally get that none of your comment was meant as transphobia; I even used to think that "historical deadnaming" was the best way to write to avoid confusion, so I sympathize. I eventually realized, though, as e.g. on Wikipedia's article for Elliot Page, that using their real gender and their chosen name historically is not confusing and is just more accurate to how being transgender actually works – i.e. that it's not a decision somebody makes one day.

I don't think it's severe enough to rub up against Lemmy.World Terms of Service Rule 1.2 as "discrimination against queer groups", so this is just a polite request and hopefully food for thought.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The series he participated in was the Trans Am series.

This better not awaken something in them

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

LOL. Lemmy... downvoted for facts.

[–] EponymousBosh@awful.systems 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Downvoted for deadnaming someone. It'd be a decent joke otherwise.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Serious question here. If someone was well known as a previous name and sex, is it still deadnaming to refer to them that was in a historical context? They’re a perfect example here. If looking for historical information on their racing history and articles, you have to refer to them as Bruce.

[–] EponymousBosh@awful.systems 12 points 2 days ago

IMO, best practice is still to use the current name/pronouns. I think it's OK to say something like "Caitlyn, formerly known as Bruce" if clarity is needed and then proceed with current name going forward. In this instance, everyone knew who we were talking about so it was unnecessary.

[–] CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My personal take: If I'm synthesizing historical information and recounting it in the current day, I would use their current name and pronouns. The person they are today (or died as) still did those things. It also gives space to recognize that, although they might not gave had the opportunity to be out as a trans person during those achievements, doesn't mean they didn't feel trans back then.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They didn't. Jenner went by Bruce and their gender identity was male at the time.

[–] EponymousBosh@awful.systems 7 points 2 days ago

Still best practice to use current name unless the person has specified otherwise.

[–] hamid@crazypeople.online 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In 2020 I was recalling a story about wanting to be them as a kid because of the Wheaties box and deadnamed them and people got really really mad at me. I had absolutely no idea they were the same person as Caitlyn Jenner, never seen or knew anything about the Kardashian's and had no idea they didn't just fall off and disappear completely

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Like you, I am almost completely unaware of anything said or done by the Kardashians, and I love that for both of us.