this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
460 points (80.6% liked)
Political Memes
11571 readers
3161 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"Never blame the politicians for fielding a candidate that many would be unable to bring themselves to vote for due to her support of mass child murder, blame instead the people who can't bring themselves to vote for a supporter of mass child murder"
-- This posts and other DNC propaganda posts like it.
If one didn't support the opposition, then they're implicitly in support of who ends up in power.
Sadly our votes are one of the few things we have as normies that give us power, what you do and don't do with it is important. Even if in your jurisdiction you see both (or more) candidates as being bad, there is always a lesser evil.
What opposition
I'm talking more generally, the world is bigger than just America. You know what I meant.
Word, I support Hamas
That would only be correct if the voting system was not cyclical.
In reality that's not the case: today's vote results help shape which candidates are made available to voters the next time around, the one after that and so on.
So can be perfectly reasonable to look at the options put forward today and decide to not vote in order try and have better options available tomorrow - it's the logic of trying to preempt a tomorrow were all choices are both worse than today's worst option.
Mind you, this is not me saying that with Trump as one of the candidates doing so was the best possible choice - just explaining how it's actually a logical choice if one thought Trump was not the danger he turned out to be.
I suspect that if in the last 3 decades most people had been thinking and chosing in the way I suggest rather than falling for the deceitful simplification that each time they vote they must chose the "lesser evil", the situation were both the Democrats and the Republicans fielded Genocide supporting candidates would never have happenned since at least the Democrats would have long ago and repeateadly been punished for fielding ever more rightwing candidates and thus never arrived at a situation were their candidate was so far to the right that they support the modern day version of Nazis doing their own Genocide as long as the consequences are kept abroad.
It's because of such mechanics and decades of too many people falling for the DNC propaganda about the obligation to vote lesser evil, that America moved more and more towards the poverty riddled Fascism shithole that it is today - somebody like Trump as POTUS was always bound to happen when the leftmost party of the Money uber-alles + Political duopoly system in the US found a way to not be punished for keeping on moving ever more to the right and even now there's really no way this trend will stop (much less revert) until the top power of the land - Money - actually suffers for the country being too rightwing (which, curiously, might happen due to Trump, though the risk is the Republicans just replace him with a more intelligent Fascist).
I understand what you're getting at, but I would partially counter with that losing parties may instead weigh their policy decisions more towards the people they know will vote. Rather than potentially wasting time catering for those that have shown that in the end they may not vote at all. I would wager (on top of many other factors) this could be why many countries' historically left leaning parties have been moving more and more towards the centre as time goes on. Labour in the UK are a prime example.