this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
102 points (94.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39045 readers
1938 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Obviously, the internet has always been a toxic place, (the phrase "flame war" has been around for decades,) but it seems to have gotten so much worse over the last few years. I used to think decentralization of the internet would fix the worst of it, but Lemmy seems to have gotten worse alongside the rest of internet culture, proving me wrong. How do we fix/improve this culture of toxicity?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Libb@piefed.social 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

How do we fix/improve this culture of toxicity?

We don't because:

  1. it's a wider issue than 'the Internet'. Haven't you noticed how even politics in general, which was supposed to be the epitome of our democratic societies, has morphed into an hate-filled shit show at best, when it's not effing openly celebrating murders and assassinations of people we don't like?
  2. we're part of the issue. It's not a 'them' vs 'us'. It's us. And most of us, no matter what we believe in, are acting like morons, at best.

but Lemmy seems to have gotten worse alongside the rest of internet culture, proving me wrong.

Lemmy has not "gotten worse" in my opinion. It was worse to begin with and when I arrived a few years ago, the first thing I had to urgently learn is how to filter out what I call its 'noise': that constant (and self-celebrating) hatred for 'the other camp', the hatred for those who dare not think like 'us' (I certainly don't put myself in that group). I then moved from Lemmy to Piefed, mostly because back then at least it offered me simpler/more efficient ways to filter out that noise.

How do we fix/improve this culture of toxicity?

Like mentioned in other comments, the only way is through changing (civil) society itself. Aka through education.

As long as our respective public educative systems (I'm from France, but I know it's as shitty in the USA if not worse) are allowed to not do their job of actually educating and teaching kids some common values and principles (next to some actual knowledge and know-how), toxicity will thrive.

It thrives because it has been normalized and because those who benefit from it are being regarded as role models. But it's even worse than that: just publicly discussing this issue and its causes would expose anyone to being... punished by an angry toxic crowd of people that don't want to hear they're being toxic (or that their 'ideology' they want so hard to believe in have morphed them into assholes). That is a huge loss for any freedom respecting society, and a huge win for those benefiting from that hate/toxicity.

edit: clarifications.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

2 reminded me of a saying. You're not stuck in traffic, you ARE traffic.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

and sometimes you have no choice but to submit. and that's OK

it's also not your fault if a drunk driver or similar crashes into you and causes a traffic jam... it's the other person's fault.

way too many toxic folks on lemmy are apologizing for the drunk driver and blaming the victim constantly. especially when they identify with the drunk driver or start thinking 'he had no choice!'

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I don't buy this narrative that toxicity is inevitable. That's the narrative pushed by Reddit/Xitter/Meta because toxicity causes engagement which makes them rich. They don't want to delete it. It's only inevitable if admins allow it to be.

That "rule" don't apply on Fedi where we can simply join an instance that actively bans all the bs.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don’t buy this narrative that toxicity is inevitable.

You're more than welcome to buy what you fancy, I don't recall saying it was unavoidable. I even think I mentioned why we somehow manged to make it as... present as it is, and how we should try to get rid of most of it (hint: through education).

Can we get rid of all of it? Nope, unless one is to pretend we're perfect? Don't know about you but I'm certainly not perfect.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My belief is that toxicity online is like building a six lane highway through a residential neighborhood. If you build the infrastructure to support more cars, and the law allows speeding you're going to get more cars (and more car accidents).

If you build platforms that don't allow cars/limit their behavior where people are trying to have a polite conversation, you'll see quiet more thoughtful modes of transportation and fewer innocent bystanders get hurt.

Wow that analogy worked pretty well.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My opinion is that toxicity can be found in every little gesture in our daily life, no need for an highway. It's also not somethign 'external' to us that appears because of poor decisions. It can and often thrives even in the most 'humble' or humane 'infrastructures', to use you image. Suffice to look how two people, say two neighbors, can literally hate on one another for petty reasons.

If you build platforms that don’t allow cars/limit their behavior where people are trying to have a polite conversation, you’ll see quiet more thoughtful modes of transportation and fewer innocent bystanders get hurt.

People can have a fight on the street, or in a pub, in a shop, at work, or wherever, even at home, within a family circle, because "he looked at me!" or because "I don't like the way he dress" kind of reasons. Do you really think tech is the issue?

But once again, you're more than welcome to believe what you want to believe. Just don't try to put words in my mouth that I did not say.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm not trying to put words in your mouth, but it sure seems like you're saying that toxicity can inevitably be found in every little gesture in our daily life, including internet platforms, which is a narrative I disagree with.

People can have a fight on the street, or in a pub, in a shop, at work, or wherever

Pretty much all pubs and shops I know quickly expel and ban people who fight there. If those places allowed fighting (as many internet platforms do) users looking for a fight would eventually gravitate there, and people looking to discuss peacefully will go elsewhere.

Do you really think tech is the issue?

No, I'm saying people are the issue. Toxicity is not something that can be found everywhere, it only pops up where it's allowed to flourish.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why?

toxicity is inevitable in real life such as much. toxic people are everywhere, and they drag people down with them.

i've had toxic family, friends, and co-workers. sometimes you have no choice but to live with it, sometimes you can ignore it, sometimes you can boot the person from your life if they cross certain boundaries. and sometimes the toxic person tries to get you removed.

the false tech bro assumption I've seen since forever, is the idea you can engineer out people's negative behaviors and impulses... you can't. they will find a way to exploit whatever system you set up. that's what they do... that's what makes them toxic. you cannot create a social media network that is free from toxic people, unless you make one with no people involved.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago

I'm not talking about engineering a problem away. I'm saying it can't be engineered away and requires human adults in the room (moderators in this case) to handle bad behavior.

Accepting the presence of toxicity as a fact of life does nothing more than attract more toxicity.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your posts are really great. Just wanted to say it's super cool to have someone thoughtful contributing and articulating a realistic approach.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Thank you very much. I'm just sharing what I think.

[–] baitu@jlai.lu 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Couldn't agree more! People should be more tolerant and stop hating on people having different opinions

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago

...What's the different opinion Anakin?