this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
596 points (97.9% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

9715 readers
608 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When the “woke” mania swept the country in 2020, I took a step back and reevaluated where I stood and why I stood there. To my surprise, I found that I agreed with conservatives and libertarians on a number of issues. I opposed childhood gender transitions, unlawful and divisive DEI mandates, and the excesses of Critical Race Theory. I argued against biological males competing in women’s sports and being housed in women’s prisons. I did so loudly and publicly, losing many friends along the way.

Today, some of those same attorneys I worked with are advocating for my right to marry my fiancée to be stripped away.

I fell for obvious right-wing propaganda and rationalized the hate with reason and logic. Now the hate machine is coming for me and that's not fair!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nope, this is natural.

Like, straight up default human behavior, and conservativesare actually really good at manipulating people using basic human psychology.

An absolute shit ton of people who grew up as "outsiders" really just want to be with the majority "in group" and are willing to side with them against smaller minorities.

Like, that's the whole TERF thing in a nutshell.

Women who were treated poorly for being women, and trying to side with their abusers against a weaker target.

It's literally the reason most mothers abuse their children. Same psychology, just different target.

Hell, it's the same reason weak men target women and children in the first place

An innate desire for a "human pecking order" that displays at varying rates due to normal human variation.

Racism too, LBJ described it generations ago after seeing firsthand what Republicans were doing in the South:

If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/lbj-convince-the-lowest-white-man/

We need to understand why this keeps working to fight it...

[–] wide_eyed_stupid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It’s literally the reason most mothers abuse their children.

I'm sorry, but most mothers abuse their children? Where did you get this?

[–] Lizard@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm reading that as "the reason most mothers who abuse their children do so"

[–] wide_eyed_stupid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Fair enough, that was probably the intention.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

...

That's really how you took that?

[–] proudblond@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I took it that way too honestly. Honestly it made me skip reading the rest of your argument until I saw the comments below it talking about what you actually meant, so yeah, syntax is annoying but necessary for getting the point you want to make across. (I did go back and read the rest of your argument.)

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Let's try again:

Having diabetes is the reason most people inject insulin.

Do you think that means:

  1. Most people inject insulin.

  2. Of the people who inject insulin, the most common reason for doing so is they have diabetes

[–] wide_eyed_stupid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, because that's literally what it says. And how am I supposed to know you don't actually believe that? Crazier things have happened! Figured I'd ask, to be sure.

I get what you intended to say though.