this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
596 points (97.9% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

9715 readers
834 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When the “woke” mania swept the country in 2020, I took a step back and reevaluated where I stood and why I stood there. To my surprise, I found that I agreed with conservatives and libertarians on a number of issues. I opposed childhood gender transitions, unlawful and divisive DEI mandates, and the excesses of Critical Race Theory. I argued against biological males competing in women’s sports and being housed in women’s prisons. I did so loudly and publicly, losing many friends along the way.

Today, some of those same attorneys I worked with are advocating for my right to marry my fiancée to be stripped away.

I fell for obvious right-wing propaganda and rationalized the hate with reason and logic. Now the hate machine is coming for me and that's not fair!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 127 points 3 days ago (3 children)

When the “woke” mania swept the country in 2020, I took a step back and reevaluated where I stood and why I stood there. To my surprise, I found that I agreed with conservatives and libertarians on a number of issues. I opposed childhood gender transitions, unlawful and divisive DEI mandates, and the excesses of Critical Race Theory. I argued against biological males competing in women’s sports and being housed in women’s prisons. I did so loudly and publicly, losing many friends along the way. My stance wasn’t rooted in hate or fear but in a commitment to reason and fairness. My loyalty was to the truth, not to political tribes. Maintaining my integrity cost me greatly, but I believed it was worth it.

Hey Reid Newton: you're a bigot and a complete fucking moron. Anyone that has two functioning braincells figured out within 10 minutes of first hearing it that "critical race theory" was just a euphemism for "the honest history of how America has fucked over every racial minority consistently though its entire history". If you think that DEI or critical race theory are real problems, you have the critical thinking skills of a brick wall. Fuck this gal for trying to rationalize her betrayal of her own community.

[–] Mniot@programming.dev 51 points 3 days ago (1 children)

100%

Also the "it wasn't a fear-based decision, I just rationally opposed all the forced child gender-transitions". It's not possible to roll ones eyes hard enough.

I actually do have empathy for a TERF who'd say, "I uncritically chugged conservative media and become terrified of stories about men 'transitioning' as a way to attach women. Now I see that was all lies and I was a fool who never tried putting myself in others' shoes."

[–] SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

attach women

Did you mean 'attack'?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

TERF - Transylvanian Entity Repeatedly Feeding

[–] Mniot@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's interesting how the English language makes a phrase like "trans women are women" ambiguous about the number of women that each trans woman is... I always assumed "one" but you raise an interesting question.

Given the correlation between trans and plurality, the average is probably higher than one... although I think we would not have much trouble finding a trans woman who would enthusiastically assert her lack of personhood.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

...what are you talking about? That question is about a typo.

[–] Mniot@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The question itself self-answers with a little bit of thought: reading the typo as-is doesn't make sense and there's only one obvious correction, which SalmiakDragon provided. So I read their question as more conversation/chattiness rather than genuine confusion. I was replying in kind with an attempt to riff off of my typo: what if the typo was actually intended? Could we find any meaning to the phrase "attach women"? No, not really.

[–] SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was trying to be polite, and leave room in case I had misunderstood. A simple clarification of what you meant would have sufficed.

[–] Mniot@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Oh, my bad then. Yes: you were right.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 days ago

also it was one fucking book that the PR machine blew out of proportion, I read it at the time and i really struggle to remember what was even in it, it was just some essays about the history of race in the US, which have just merged with all my other memories of similar stories

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

CRT is poorly defined; every time I hear it discussed I just think of the immortal words of Bo Burnham: "The backlash to the backlash to the thing that's just begun."

DEI on the other hand is well-defined (if increasingly misused nowadays) and I actually think there are good arguments to disapprove of it. Race really shouldn't be used as a proxy for diagnosing socioeconomic disadvantage; if a student has experienced adversity, you should use that directly to qualify them for aid or increased preference in admissions.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That Funny Feeling hit me like a pallet of bricks to the face when I first heard it. Couldn't stop sobbing for an hour. Still makes me tear up after so many relistens.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, Inside has some of the best music exploring those unique and, especially for the time, topical, themes that I've ever heard.

I might go listen to it right now...