this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
876 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

83632 readers
3294 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 251 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Smart TVs are really just somebody else's computer that you paid for to watch ads on.

[–] remon@ani.social 103 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This. There is a reason why dumb displays of a similar size are much more expensive. Because the manufacturer can't feed you ads and sell your data ...

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 29 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I don't understand the need for those. My smart tv is functioning exactly as a computer monitor. It is connected via a display connection to my computer, and nothing else. It does show a brief warning that it is unconnected to the internet whenever I turn it on, but it disappears after 10 seconds or so.

[–] remon@ani.social 58 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Yeah, but that's not how most people use Smart TVs. Also, they're still coming for you, next up they'll try to insert ads via HDMI. and good luck finding a Smart TV with display port.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

good luck finding a Smart TV with display port.

Hisense?

[–] remon@ani.social 1 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, and that is a very recent one from a not-that-well know company. Go figure!

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago

They can't add ads if they're not connected to the ibternet

[–] besmtt@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Displayport via USB-C could start gaining momentum.

[–] Cryxtalix@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's a possibility with chromebooks because of the google ad network, but I can't see why consoles, linux, mac, even windows tbh, has any incentive to support this. At best, they might make it an option, but there's nothing in it for them. It actively makes their content look worse, while an ad supported OS like windows already has capability to place ads anyway.

[–] MinFapper@startrek.website 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

$$$

Consoles are a shrinking market. If they were offered money by TV manufacturers to cooperate with putting more ads on it, they most certainly will.

And I suspect Microsoft/Windows will too. Apple might not, though.

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah. Apple is plenty evil but not having ads is, generally, part of their “premium feel.” There are exceptions to this, unfortunately, especially recently.

But I definitely don’t regret doing a factory reset on my LG TV and hooking up an Apple TV.

[–] pfr@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago
[–] ji59@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Ads via HDMI shouldn't work if the TV doesn't have internet connection, by my understanding. So I do not see any problems there.

[–] felbane@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

oh don't worry, they'll start participating in mesh networks with your neighbors' smart devices and getting internet access that way

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

or using like 4g/5g network for ads for free, sucking up all the data bandwidth from smartphone users so they can make sure we got our daily ad dosage!

[–] felbane@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

ANTI-CORPORATE PROPAGANDA DETECTED. PLEASE DRINK VERIFICATION CAN.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I seem to recall reafing that smart TVs have a list of default passwords they use to try and connect to the to wifi networks they find...

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 5 points 1 day ago

So they try to brute force in to our wifis? Why no one sued them?!

[–] besmtt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My husband had the Tv connected to the internet, even though we watch everthing from the xbox. I changed the wifi password a few months ago, and never reconnected the TV.

Best decision ever.

[–] datavoid@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

I love how roku won't let you re-order apps unless you are online. Fuck off!

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

TVs often do a bad job at switching on when the computer turns on, then off when it turns off/goes to sleep. Drives me spare. That was fixed in like 1995-2000 for normal monitors.

[–] Bananskal@nord.pub 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

CEC has been around for years. This is probably more an issue with the PC in question rather than the TV. TVs do an excellent job at turning themselves on when CEC is enabled. 👍

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 1 points 34 minutes ago

PCs have almost never supported CEC. PCs use a different signalling method to indicate to the monitor that they're on/off.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

I use mine the same way, but many people don't. My parents would rather be logged in on the tv than connect a laptop or other pc for the same access but better results

[–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

What are the chances the 10-second warning becomes a 90-second unskippable one?

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And now look how high $ CRTs are, even the low end ones.

I'll never get rid of mine. You can't get a 0 ms latency TV with zero "features" anymore. And those commercial TVs dont come with remotes. I never liked how flat screens look either. Laggy and awful colors. I'm sure a $3000 oled is great but no thanks

I also despise massive TVs so another win. People with 80" TVs in their living room are just ick.

[–] delikt@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The same reason i stopped playing on Consoles since the PS2 - there was no good reason for the People to get this kind of things on the internet.

It was just good for the Business to hold the connection to you and control whatever they produced.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I got a PS3 and a PS4 so I wouldn't need to use Windows for gaming. That's not an issue anymore, though.

[–] delikt@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Steamdeck here and the last time i played on Windows was like 2015/2016 but never again after Win10 shutdown my System for an Update while i played a LoL ranked Game.. That was the last Time i used Windows for privat use. After that i formated the HDD and installed Linux Mint

I'm still very happy with this decision

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I thought LoL was one of the games that require windows for kernel level anticheat?

[–] delikt@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago

Yes, but at least the kernel Anti Cheat belongs since 2024 i belive? There was a long Time before DXVK or Proton you can play nearly nothing on Linux but LoL worked "okayish". Nothing close to play ranked but for a casual normal game it was good enought to let me switch to Linux this times and ditch Windows at all

[–] Granen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That was a somewhat recent development, they had many years to suffer playing Leauge on Linux c:

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] delikt@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

What is a user error?

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The last console I owned was the Xbox 360. Once I started seeing non-gaming advertisements on my home screen, I lost all interest in the product line.

Sometimes I think internet connectivity was a mistake.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Commercial TVs are so worth the extra cost. Recently got a Samsung Commercial Non-Smart TV and paired it with my $20 debloated/deGoogled Onn 4K Streaming box from Walmart. Bam, got a media setup that I fully own.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] leoj@piefed.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

$453.00 # 43" Samsung HU6000F Non-Smart Hospitality TV with Pro:Idiom for Set Top Box Deployments

Nice!

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

yeah I got a bit lazy there, at 55 inches you are at $604

When you go to 65 though its $1004 so pretty big jump.

Oddly enough going from 65 to 75 is only another ~375 USD (1377)

To me the best deal seems like 50 or 55 inches, although your room size and seating positions are likely the most important.

Also interesting if you're in the USA Best Buy does have some non-smart TVs and even a filter for it, although its mostly no-name brands or Samsung.

[–] SirHaxalot@nord.pub 2 points 1 day ago

This really has nothing to do with Smart TVs in itself though.. It's just a problem if you choose to play YouTube videos on your TV, which seems like a pretty reasonable thing to want to do.