this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
45 points (97.9% liked)
Technology
42677 readers
384 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I get that, but how many people are still running a 486 without a bespoke use case in 2026? The older kernels still work, and no software targeting the 486 architecture is relying on the latest Linux kernel.
As long as the PC isn't being connected to the internet, there's no reason you can't just keep running an old kernel.
Even if it is connected, you can keep running an old kernel.
You can, but it’s a bad idea. Pretty major security risk.
Is it?
Just use Linux 6.12 with LTS until 2029 and Super LTS until 2036.
Yeah I meant after the support window ends.
What are you running on a 486 these days that needs to be online? A pihole? Like, even if this is a CNC controller or vinyl cutter (if you need a dongle to run your output, this is a valid concern; not a lot of parallel ports hanging out on mobos these days), the internet is not required.
We agree completely. Offline is better.
What kind of security risk are you at running a 486? You can barely handle the TLS handshake. Modern malware would just brick your system the same way any other modern software would.
I was speaking in general. Everyone's risk tolerance is different. Offline is better if you can.
My point was more along the lines of online being impractical. Sure, you can still connect to servers running old software (in which case kernel updates aren't useful to you anyway), but anything with modern security or software is going to just not run at all on it, whether because the software is too heavy for the processor or because it simply was not compiled for it (and cannot be).
Point is, I think we both agree that the only reasonable usecase for these processors is offline or on a separate network (LAN/tunneled/etc).