this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
460 points (80.6% liked)
Political Memes
11571 readers
3161 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
1) Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
2) No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
3) Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
4) No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
5) No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You know, I can quote a whole bunch of civil rights icons' opinions about moderation and compromise, but that'd just be us arguing over who has the best black friends.
So I'll just point out that despite all the wise compromise and statesman concessions to white supremacy, it remains a problem somehow.
So, your black friends are telling you that there's been no progress since 1860?
And let's turn it around.
Both Mao and Stalin were uncompromising in their efforts to get rid of capitalism.
Both Russia and China are rife with billionaires.
I must make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season." Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
I had hoped that the white moderate would understand that law and order exist for the purpose of establishing justice and that when they fail in this purpose they become the dangerously structured dams that block the flow of social progress. I had hoped that the white moderate would understand that the present tension in the South is a necessary phase of the transition from an obnoxious negative peace, in which the Negro passively accepted his unjust plight, to a substantive and positive peace, in which all men will respect the dignity and worth of human personality. Actually, we who engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is already alive. We bring it out in the open, where it can be seen and dealt with. Like a boil that can never be cured so long as it is covered up but must be opened with all its ugliness to the natural medicines of air and light, injustice must be exposed, with all the tension its exposure creates, to the light of human conscience and the air of national opinion before it can be cured.
-Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Thank you for proving my point.
King was as bad as any of those 'Liberals' when it came to gay rights.
Completely ignored the gays, because he knew that America in 1963 wasn't ready to talk about that.
What point for I prove? Just because someone is wrong about one thing makes them wrong about another?
You proved that the best strategy isn't always the one that looks 'best.'
King knew that he couldn't fight every fight at once, so he stepped away from some issues.
Rustin [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayard_Rustin] didn't push King to deal with gay rights because he knew the time wasn't right.
King wasn't 'wrong' to ignore gay rights in 1964, he was smart enough to read the country and know when to be silent.
Dr. King was a preacher in a mid-20th century southern black context. He likely didn't believe in gay marriage. Hell, Obama only supported "civil unions" in 2004. Most prominent figures on the left were silent on gay rights until relatively recently.
I don't know if that's the argument you think it is? The first modern Chinese and Russian billionaires are products of the 80s/90s, decades after the deaths of Stalin and Mao. Arguably, there's a fair amount of compromising that led to the collapse of the USSR and the rise of capitalist communism in China created these billionaires. Maybe if they'd kept a harder, purer, uncompromising communist line there'd be fewer billionaires.
You can also take a look at Reconstruction. Any black person will tell you that while there has been progress, it's obviously not been enough. And Reconstruction played a large part in that. We were uncompromising at first, which led to real results. Then we compromised and Reconstruction ended. And the South went right back to the way things had been.
The sad truth is that if more people were uncompromising on their moral core, we probably wouldn't be in this mess.
"If more people were uncompromising..."
My favorite magic word. "If..."
We can wish for a better world, or accept and deal with the facts of the here and now.