this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
85 points (94.7% liked)

news

833 readers
1283 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

  1. Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
  2. Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
  3. Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
  4. Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
  5. No link shorteners
  6. No entire article in the post body

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I doubt it. States have tried over and over again (both recently and in the past) to require the Bible, to require the 10 commandments, and on and on to no ultimate success. The Establishment Clause is clear, and this is more political theater from a Republican dominated government trying to gin up support for the midterms by creating a spectacle.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

And yet none of the attempts in the last decade have stuck. Same SCOTUS.

This is just political theater.

[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's nothing in the constitution that prevents Bible Studies from being mandatory, it's existed in the past.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

Yes and no: the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment prevents the government from overtly favoring one religion over another, so if they want Bible studies in public schools, they'll have to equitably provide Catholics, Satanists, Muslims, Witches, Polytheists, etc. the same deference and inclusion in teaching materials as Protestant Christianity.