this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
427 points (99.8% liked)

News

37007 readers
2317 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump’s threats to carry out mass bombing of civilian infrastructure in Iran present US military officers with a dilemma: disobey orders or help commit war crimes.

It is an urgent matter for the US chain of command. In an expletive-laden threat, Trump set a Tuesday 8pm Washington time deadline for the Iranian government to open the strait of Hormuz or face “Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one”.

There is little debate among legal experts that such an attack on the life-supporting infrastructure for 93 million Iranians would constitute a war crime.

“Such rhetorical statements – if followed through – would amount to the most serious war crimes – and thus the president’s statements place service members in a profoundly challenging situation,” two former judge advocate general (JAG) officers, Margaret Donovan and Rachel VanLandingham wrote on the website Just Security on Monday.

“As former uniformed military lawyers who advised targeting operations, we know the president’s words run counter to decades of legal training of military personnel and risk placing our warfighters on a path of no return.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Is it? If you follow orders you will most likely not be punished in any way. If you don't then you definitely will.

I mean, it's easy for you to tell others to take that risk I guess, maybe that's what you meant.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 hour ago

You know, funny, we didn’t sign up for fighting bullshit wars while claiming we’d die for our country while also claiming we won’t protect the country from fascism because we are shaking in our boots over being court martialed. You see death is worse so us expecting those fucking assholes to do what they fucking bullied us all into pretending they already do is the fucking bare minimum we should be demanding.

Or maybe I should say it’s fucking easy to go take the American tax payers dollars for your socialist free college and your socialist free healthcare while being a fucking pussy that won’t stand the fuck up to fascism when it tugs on your balls.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 hours ago

If your choice is between murdering countless innocents or being executed I expect you to die, and we're not even to the point yet that the consequences would be that severe. The "home of the brave" seems to be awfully tolerant of cowardice in its military as of late.

[–] toad@lemmy.wtf 5 points 5 hours ago

If you follow orders you will most likely not be punished in any way

lmao the rope is waiting for you. I'd rather get martial courted for insubordination than getting hung for war crime.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

Yes agency - what an awful thing to have. Better be a mindless drone and just coast through life being someone's bitch huh

I'm not directing this at you btw. Just this mentality of "oh I have no choice but to submit" is what got us in ww3 to begin with.

[–] currycourier@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

Its what let the Holocaust happen too

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

We could have a very long Nuanced discussion about what led us to this place, I'm not entirely sure your factor is the overriding one either, although it is a factor.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (5 children)

It's not about agency it's about a very real risk. You will be court-martialed for disobeying an order. Period.

You will then need to fight a lengthy and public legal battle against the US government to prove that your disobeying was legal. And the result is very much not guaranteed.

That is a significant risk to ask of a soldier and should not be underestimated. I hear your armchair "well they should be brave" whining but this is reality.

[–] Arcadeep@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Don't you make the choice to risk your life for your country already by joining the military? Sounds like this is that risk for them. Risk stepping on an IED killing children or getting a court martial for not killing children is a risk either way, but one is infinitely better than the other.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago

And even if you won that Court battle, politicians including the president might call you out by name, they absolutely would call you out by name, and make you a hated figure and a target across the entire country. Not just for the maga diehards, but for all of those conniving police and prosecutors looking to curry favor with the administration.

[–] toad@lemmy.wtf 2 points 5 hours ago

Sentence for insubordination: 5 years or more

Sentence for crime against humanity: lifetime or the rope.

Sounds like a nobrainer

[–] toad@lemmy.wtf 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

And if you commit war crime it won't be a martial court that will hung you.

Well not an american one.

Of course that's in a world where there's a justice and we're not led by a bunch of american pedophiles.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Sure but it's only reality because everyone's too pussy to take responsibility thus the framework is not protecting agency. So it becomes and endless circle of no one's taking responsibility out of fear thus no one's agency is being protected.

The answer here has been clear since ancient Greek philosophers - virtue. As a soldier, or any professional for that matter, you have to rule your position through virtue not fear. This is the only way to resist oppression and deception.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Sure but it’s only reality because everyone’s too pussy to take responsibility

It's always easy for somebody with no skin in the game to demand another person risk everything they have.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

No I take my existence seriously and take responsibility. Just because a person is not capable of holding responsibility doesn't mean they're entitled to the position - can't do it? Then fucking do something else.

[–] toad@lemmy.wtf 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Somebody have blown a village in iraq like a good doggie. People like you disgust me.

"No skin in the game", go tell that to the people under the bombs, asshole