this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
1264 points (93.3% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

9694 readers
29 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I love how disenchanted voters complain about a 2 party system but fail to realize that in a democracy changing that is on them. It takes time, money, and lots hard work to build a viable 3rd alternative. Dems and GOP have zero incentive to help that process.

[–] BogeyTheSwear@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, a "viable third option" will never exist in the current system. Your democracy isn't democratic.

In Europe we don’t use a winner-takes-all system like in the U.S. Instead, we use proportional representation, which means parties get seats based on how many votes they receive. That’s why we have many parties in parliament, not just two.

But even the European system is in my book not a true democracy. Its simply the best democratic system we could come up with before industrialisation, but the world is different now.

The only real democracy in the world, which i wish my country would adopt, is the Swiss.

[–] jeffep@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The two party system is only the issue superficially. Compromises have to be made at different stages. Germany has a multi party system, with the effect that governments have to be formed as coalitions based on compromises. Suddenly the party you voted for because they support renewables starts to support surveillance tech and wants to kick out immigrants. Then they write a coalition agreement that isn't worth the paper it's written on, and let themselves be pushed through their 4 years by right wing media.

Two party systems have their issues, but once a party is elected, they can actually do what they said they would do. Now everyone is shocked trump does exactly that

[–] BogeyTheSwear@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Thats why i said the only real democracy is the Swiss.

In Switzerland you can appoint any person to be your representative, not just the pre-selected candidates, and you can keep them as your representative for as long as you trust them to actually represent your opinions.

If you know that you differ in certain topics, you can you say "hey, i'm gonna make this decision myself buddy" and then you vote on the law yourself, and he can continue to represent you in the elections you agree on.

Or if your representative betrays your trust, you can say "fuck you, i'm finding someone else" from day to day, not having to wait another 4 years to vote for another pre-selected candidate.

Democracy is supposed to mean that the people govern. Any model of democracy where your vote can be used to make decisions you disagree with, is not democratic.

Representative democracy might have been the best model 200 years ago, but in the 21st century it is dated and abused.