this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
452 points (98.7% liked)

politics

29286 readers
1958 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump said Sunday that if no peace deal is reached with Iran in the next 48 hours, "we're blowing up the entire country."

The president made the threat Sunday to ABC News' senior political correspondent Rachel Scott in response to a question regarding whether his previously stated timeline of two to three weeks for a deal was still accurate.

Concerns have been raised about targeting civilian infrastructure in Iran and the consequences that could bring.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LumberjackRanger@leminal.space 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Sounds like he wants to use the big bombs. I really hope somebody can physically intervene if he goes for the button.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He wants to be known as the man who was "strong enough" to nuke a country into oblivion.

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep

I've been saying this since his first term, but people said that I was overreacting

[–] El_Scapacabra@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

Genuinely the first thing I thought when he was elected. They're going to hand this deranged lunatic the codes and he will find any reason to use them just to prove how powerful he is.

And I've also been told I was overreacting at every turn, until he did exactly what I said he would do. And then they said I was overreacting about the next thing he ended up doing. "Of course he's going to give up the presidency if he loses the election, he's not going to try anything weird or illegal, don't be ridiculous!"

Yeah, it's been a very long, exhausting decade.

"The missiles are flying, hallelujah!"

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There is no button he has unilaterally press and never has been its an order that must be given to others who actually launch

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

Yes, but they're also legally required to follow that order, except for certain circumstances. The question is if someone in the chain will have the moral backbone to stop said order, and it can't just be the person launching it as there are more that can be launched. It needs to be someone high up in the chain. It may also require them physically stopping him from just asking the next person.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

And they all blindly worship him soooo it’s not looking good for the world.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

He does kind of have a 'button' in the form of the "football" that sends the order straight to the ICBMs silos but I'm pretty sure those are pre-aimed at Russian targets. He doesn't push the button, an unthinking brainwashed military pawn does it. That is sent to more unthinking brainwashed military pawns who actually launch the missiles.

Tactical nukes would have to go through more people but they'd probably just follow orders too.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago