this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
144 points (97.4% liked)
Linux
13143 readers
977 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's not true. Systemd isn't making moves to add age verification. They added a field to STORE a birth date, which is not enforcing anything. It's like a field in a database. It can be there, but you don't have to use it.
Systemd is not in the position to do anything. The age verification has to be implemented by the OS vendor, not by Systemd. That lie is spread by people with very little knowledge of how linux actually works.
No idea, but there are lots of ways. You could put it into the
archinstallscript and just never finish the installation if there is no age set. You could also prevent a user from logging into an account that has no age set, this could be achived by modified core packages in thebasepackage.However, you will ALWAYS be able to circumvent it as there is no central server to manage it. Nobody is stopping you to put 01.01.1970 into the birthdate field. It's basically as pointless as cookie banners.
The issue about this age verification shit isn't the present, but the future when governments start extending the laws that, at this point, are already in place.